Here is some of the latest research from Zengar
Outcome Analysis 2013 using NeurOptimal® Neurofeedback - A retrospective chart review. NeurOptimal® neurofeedback is designed to interface with the nervous system as a Non-Linear Complex Dynamical System, whereas traditional ‘evidence based’ research tends to measure linearly. Therefore, it seems reasonable to measure outcomes because that’s what prospective clients and referral sources really want to know. Since NeurOptimal® is training at the source of complaints, the nervous system’s turbulence, rather than treating diagnostic categories, it also seemed reasonable to look at outcomes across diagnostic categories rather than try to compare medically defined groups where fallible diagnostic judgments create more issues.
Joan Cross, BSc, PT, MPH from the InnerWave Center
A doctoral dissertation submitted to the Dean of Behavioural Health, July 2010.
Karen Cochrane, Ph.D
Brain-Mind Operational Architectonics Imaging: Technical and Methodological Aspects
Andrew A. Fingelkurts, Alexander A. Fingelkurts
BM-Science – Brain & Mind Technologies Research Centre, P.O. Box 77, FI-02601, Espoo, Finland
Global qEEG Changes Associated With Non-frequency & Non-site Specific Neurofeedback Training
Dr. Ed O’Malley, Ph.D., FAASMand Merlyn Hurd, PhD, BCIAC/EEG Fellow, New York, NY